Mitsubishi Motors Corporation worked with consultants from LMS Engineering Services to pioneer new approaches that increase the speed with which body NVH can be simulated while maintaining the accuracy of full finite element models. Wave-based substructuring or WBS is a new method that was developed to assemble the structural model of the full body as an compilation of the reduced FE models of individual parts.
computational workload by limiting the analysis to only the lower-order waves, which represent nearly all of the potential deformations. The number of interface dofs is reduced from the number of connections to the number of waves, which substantially reduces the computational workload.
A key advantage of the WBS approach is that it enables additional reductions in compute time by replacing components whose modification is not under consideration with modal reduction techniques while maintaining a full finite element model for parts that are subject to modifications. The full body finite element model is first used to generate the set of waves that are then utilized to build a modal reduced model of the components. This provides substantial reductions in computational time with a minimum effect on accuracy.
Wave-based substructuring supports early body NVH optimization
The WBS method is ideal for NVH optimization of body panels that are assembled together with spot welds. The following example shows how Mitsubishi and LMS engineers validated the WBS approach on an existing model vehicle. The cowl top area was identified as an important contributor to booming noise using an earlier full body analysis. The challenge was that trying many alternative cowl top designs using full body finite element analysis would have taken too long to have a positive impact on the design process. So LMS consultants divided the body
into two substructures, the cowl top panels and the remainder. Since no design modifications were to be considered outside the cowl top panel, the remainder of the body was simplified using modal reduction. The substructures were connected with spot welds and also with glue at the windshield interface. Nearly 1000 coupling dofs in the original model were replaced by about 250 waves.
A comparison of the vibro-acoustic response of the full finite element and reduced WBS models showed very good correlation. LMS engineers then took advantage of the ability of the WBS model to evaluate new design modifications in a very short time. The actual calculation time using the WBS model was benchmarked as 50 times faster compared to the traditional FE model. They evaluated the effect of adding reinforcement bars and brackets, thickness and material changes, and various combinations of modifications. These modifications were selected through a Weak Spot Detection analysis in which the critical peaks in the response are traced back to their root cause in terms of panel contribution, modal contribution, etc. They identified a modification that combined thickness changes, both increases and decreases, with the addition of reinforcements. It reduced the vibro-acoustic response in the front seat below the design target over the entire frequency range being evaluated. Then they ran a full finite element model of their proposed modifications and verified the accuracy of the WBS predictions.
The efficiency of WBS also opens the door to automatic shape optimization. The geometric changes can be applied directly to the meshed parts of the virtual assembly using the morphing tools of LMS Virtual.Lab. An alternate approach involves linking some of the meshed panels to parameterized computer aided design (CAD) data. After any changes in the parameters, the meshes are automatically updated and replaced in the WBS assembly.
Modal projection optimizes design parameters
The second approach, modal projection of design modifications, is used for the optimization of vehicle NVH performance for small modifications, typically during the refinement phase of the development cycle. Design parameters, such as thicknesses or material properties of components such as subframes or body panels, as well as local geometry modifications can be considered. The body areas whose modification is expected to have the most impact on NVH are identified from a weak spot detection analysis and a set of nominal modifications is defined. Each nominal modification is projected in the modal domain and its effect on the system response can be quickly determined. Scaling factors are assigned to each modification and can be used as design parameters in an automated optimization process. This process aims at improving the vibro-acoustic performance of the assembly for different load cases such as road noise, booming nose, and can also be used directly on the frequency response function between input points and target points inside the passenger compartment.
An example of the modal projection approach is provided by an application where the goal was to optimize the body noise transfer function (BNTF) between the vertical input of the engine head mount and interior noise as measured by front and rear center microphones. Using weak spot detection with full body finite element analysis, a particular set of body panels was identified. The thickness of these body panels was optimized while limiting the maximum change to +/- 15%. The optimization procedure substantially reduced the BNTF. A new analysis with the full body finite element model verified the predictions provided by modal projection.
Reducing simulation time – maintaining simulation accuracy

The two procedures described here, WBS and modal projection, substantially reduce the time required for engineers to optimize body NVH performance prior to prototyping.
Both approaches reduce the size of the finite element model in order to reduce simulation solution time while providing accuracy that is essentially equivalent to a full finite element model.
The modal projection method is very well suited for optimizing components using design changes that can be represented as changes of finite element model parameters, such as material properties or shell thickness, and small modifications of the local geometry. The WBS method allows consideration of more complex changes by using wave functions to couple a finite element model of the component under consideration with reduced modal models of the parts that remain constant. Speed increases up to a factor of 100 can be achieved with both of these methods, making it practical for NVH engineers to optimize body NVH early in the design phase.